The Loss of the American Middle Class

69

By Pete Maida

There is no question that the American middle class is disappearing. There are a ton of statistics that prove that this is happening right now. It isn't just the poor economy of the past few years, but it is an evolutionary process. It is a process that no one saw as inevitable, but in twenty twenty hindsight I have to say that it was. The American middle class grew on the power of American industry. The brilliant innovations created by American inventors in the twentieth century led to the creation of the American industrial power. In the twentieth century American manufacturing was king and American products were the best in the world. With this power came opportunities for the average American to earn a good living making everything from toasters to farm tractors.

During this time of great demand for American made products, the American spirit showed itself in many ways. Some of those ways were in direct conflict with each other. Companies were always and were supposed to be, operated in a way that increases profits for themselves and their investors. To do this they had to keep production costs down, production volume up, and income steady. The American worker wanted to do their best for their families. At this time in history the American worker had value. In order to make the products that were sought after all over the world, the American worker had to make them. With this value came leverage in the form of unions. The purpose of the unions was to get the best deal they could for the rank and file. Both of these entities were doing what they were supposed to do. They were both doing the right thing. Neither considered backing off of their goals just a little and to think of the health of the economy as a whole. Why should they? There was no evidence for even a thought that Americans would have to live in a global economy. The middle class American enjoyed high wages, great benefits, and a life style unmatched in the world. Little did they know that those very advantages would come back to haunt them.

As the twentieth century came to a close American companies began to see the big picture. Shipping costs from one point on the planet to another were going down. New markets were opening up all over the world. Soon the corporate powers were struck with the realization that these markets didn't just offer goods to buy and new places to sell, but they also offered vast labor pools. They could have workers that would work for five to ten times less than what they were paying workers in the United States. This difference more that made up for building factories and shipping goods to market. The term outsourcing was coined and the American worker was in big trouble. It started with manufacturing but, as with the advance of high tech communication, jobs in telemarketing, help desks, and even engineering are now being outsourced.

This wasn't the only new weapon in the companies arsenal. Automation was quickly taking jobs off the table for American workers. It was more cost effective for a company to buy a new automated assembly line that it was to keep paying all of the workers. Robots appeared on factory floors and workers disappeared. The companies now had weapons that no union strike could stop. The strength of the union was fading from the factory floor and from the American political landscape. With it went the survival of a strong American middle class.

Again, this is not a total slam against companies. As I have mentioned in other articles, the companies are doing what they are supposed to do. It is what every 401K investor in this country wants them to do. What is happening was bound to happen. You can't stop the march toward a global society. When it comes to religion, philosophy, political views, and morals, we may be centuries away from coming together. But when it comes to making money, people are willing to put everything aside and make an agreement.

The American middle class must now compete for jobs with people all over the world. Their competitors are not in the middle class. The governments in the countries where our competitors live aren't as interested in their safety or their welfare. As a result they offer companies freedom from regulation and minimum wage laws. It is very hard for the American middle class worker to compete with what their competition has to offer and they are losing this battle.

Any economist will tell you that a strong economy hinges on the strength of the middle class. Without people making a reasonable amount of money there will be no buying power. Consumer spending must slow down if there is no disposable income to spend.

I am beginning to think that this economic time bares a close resemblance to this time of climate change. It looks like there will be many years of upheaval as the world moves from national economies to a true global economy. During that time there will be many disasters and I believe the loss of the American middle class will be one of the first to be recorded.

Please check out my novels

500 Years From Home
Amazon Price: $15.49
List Price: $15.50
The Long Journey Home
Amazon Price: $18.16
List Price: $19.95

Comments

claptona profile image

claptona Level 5 Commenter 6 months ago

The problem with the loss of the middle class is not all based on an even playing field.

Though companies shipped jobs overseas, the customs taxes and import taxes in foreign countries are basically one sided - little from the US for imports, lots of taxes for exported products from the US to "developing" countries.

This needs to change quickly. If not, then the US Government should impost as heavy a tax on imported items as the offending country is levying on imported US products.

This is the problem of government intervention in the market place - it creates more inequities than it resolves.

Fair trade is great, if it is fair. Right now it is not, and it is one of the things that have killed the middle class.

Cheers,

John D. WIlson

gmwilliams Level 7 Commenter 6 months ago

This is an excellent hub. I totally concur. We must upgrade our skills and education in order to become more competitive. Furthermore, there must be monetary and financial incentives for corporations to create jobs that guarantee a decent middle class salary. Service jobs, as it now stands, pay just above poverty-level wages.

Furthermore, the educational system must put emphasis on math and the technological and hard sciences at the elementary and high school level. Being proficient in these subjects translates into having jobs which pay high income. We must invent a new paradigm geared to postindustrial and computerized America if we want to retain the middle class. If we blindly and foolishly continue with the old paradigm, there will nothing but the very poor and the very rich!

CMerritt profile image

CMerritt Level 7 Commenter 6 months ago

This is a fantastic hub with a very valued opinion.

My perspective says that, what we once considered middle class is no longer possilbe. A man at once time could work 40 plus hours a week, with a wife at home raising children. They lived within thier means and had happy comfortable lives.

Then, Unions decided that they were entitled to MORE of the profits that Owners made. What was once a decent salary became a more than decent salary. Wives also became involved and took on these jobs and the quality of lifestyle skyrocketed.

Corperations did as you said, and Unions lost it luster.

The generation that followed is lost and the only lifestyle they knew was to have jobs like thier parents.

They need to go back a couple of generations ago, and look closely....

I kind of rambled here, and I should write my own hub on this subject.

anyway, I concur with you and vote up and awesome on this hub.

Pete Maida profile image

Pete Maida Hub Author 6 months ago

This is why I like Hubpages. I get people to respond with constructive and informative opinions on subjects. Every time I write this type of hub I get responses from smart people.

jaywigz311 profile image

jaywigz311 Level 2 Commenter 6 months ago

Great hub, and I couldn't agree more. The death of the middle class in America is a tragedy. If it's not a sweatshop worker in a third world country that you're competing against, it's an automated robot. I find it interesting that technology has so much potential to change the lives of human beings for the better, yet we live in a time where it seems that technology is actually becoming detrimental in some ways. I can only hope that as the American workforce is inserted into the global economy that the middle class doesn't disappear forever.

Dolores Monet profile image

Dolores Monet Level 7 Commenter 6 months ago

A lot of those people in the past, were able to get a descent job right out of high school, or at least a job that led to one that paid well enough to live a middle class life. Now, people need higher education. Not so many can afford higher education. And college is not for everyone, a small percentage can actually achieve in academic surroundings. So the middle class will really be a level for an elite group. The rest will be reduced to living in or near poverty.

FitnezzJim profile image

FitnezzJim Level 7 Commenter 6 months ago

Times they are changing. If we lose our middle class, and other coutntries take up the burden and benfits of prodcution, how will our individual relative wealth compare to those in other countries? Will there be a lessening in the strife between peoples, or will we find other reasons to continue warring?

niall.tubbs 6 months ago

The class in the middle managed the Capitalist work shop.White collar manager class sowed the seed that created their own superfluous existence in the work place.The petty class in the middle supported Capitalist economic and political policies.This continuous support produced the class forced exodus. Where is the middle class responsibility ?

Pete Maida profile image

Pete Maida Hub Author 6 months ago

Clearly the middle class has played a big part in their own demise, but I don't see how it could have been any other way. Comunism didn't work because their is no advancement in a society if people don't have goals.

niall.tubbs 6 months ago

Pete; there are other alternatives to Capitalism's middle class.There is middle class Socialism, every alternative to Capitalism is Communism so say Capitalist and habituated class in the middle. Alternate goals to create a better society for themselves and others. Not surprised you bring Communism to excuse the educated middle class. Educated to make money and/or social status and nothing else but excuse.

Pete Maida profile image

Pete Maida Hub Author 6 months ago

I wasn't trying to excuse the middle class. It is natural to want the best for yourself and your family. It is hard to think of the big picture all of the time. The real point of the article is that economy, like climate, must change. We will one day live as one world. The lack of equity in life styles around the world is now beginning to have an affect. It will take many years and a lot of pain before a global ecomony evens things out. It's like filling a glass with water. You may be able to slow the process to a drip but you can't stop. Sooner or later the glass will be full.

niall.tubbs 6 months ago

Pete; you believe the change will improve life for the worlds people as promoted by Capitalist. We as well as the world's people could all be equal as serfs. It is the devil's advocate and our better angle that determine the glass 1/2 full or 1/2 empty,not Capitalism's rhetoric.

Sooner or later the glass will be full,the last class in the middle delusional hope.

Submit a Comment
Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.



    • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
    • Comments are not for promoting your Hubs or other sites

    Please wait working